The Simpsons Movie – A Review

Why is The Simpsons Movie so forgettable? You and I both know the answer if you and I are the same age. The Simpsons started in 1989, for heaven’s sake! There was never an ice-cube’s chance in hell of its movie spin-off being memorable after the better part of twenty years. But still, we hoped. We remembered laughing ourselves hoarse the first time we watched Homer try to jump Springfield Gorge on a skateboard (and miss). We remembered the question (true or false?): “You can get mono from riding the monorail.” Or maybe it was the time Marge served a three-eyed fish to Mr Burns. You and I have a thousand fond memories of the salad days of the TV show – that’s why we regret it when I’m forced to write a bad review.

When The Simpsons began it was not good. That took time. The best of the show probably began somewhere round the third season – once the writers’ had found their feet and Dan Castellaneta had worked out how to do Homers’ voice (not Walter Matthau with a headcold). Once those guys knew what they were doing there was no stopping them. They wrote great parts for Albert Brooks and Danny DeVito, gave Michael Jackson a soul and showed that American comedy was the best in the world (full disclosure: I’m British – so that comes from someone who knows wit in his bones). What made the show great was that it was a cartoon that didn’t behave like a cartoon. This has been so comprehensively forgotten in the years since Matt Groening left that you’d scarcely believe it to look at the show now. But the Simpsons were best when you believed in them as a family – when the writers’ wrote dialogue for bug-eyed, yellow cartoon characters that put live-action shows to shame. And better than that – not only did they give them souls; they spared the audience from sanctimony. Never once did they make the Roseanne mistake of sacrificing laughs for an issue of the week. The Simpsons in its heyday had its sights set on what would always be funny. They weren’t desperate to follow trends or to book big names or to pander to their audience. The difference is that The Simpsons used to feel like it was written by Ben Hecht and I.A.L. Diamond, now it feels like it’s written by Joss Whedon (no disrespect, but no-one’s going to be watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer 50 years from now either).

The Simpsons Movie is a waste of time because it was made twenty years too late. Good comedy doesn’t date, but any good source of comedy can only last so long. Watching the movie is a nostalgic experience, but that’s what’s wrong – comedy should be unexpected. The best this movie can do half the time is re-hash old jokes or have the characters say something they wouldn’t be allowed to stay on TV. But this only puts the spotlight on the dearth of ideas that spawned this feeble enterprise. The Simpsons Movie isn’t written (as the early shows were written) to create something new, or better an existing template; it’s written to revive interest in a comatose TV series, and to prop-up DVD sales and sell a new computer game to the ’tweens. Fine, fine, and fine – if you’re a shareholder. But if you loved the show – steer clear. Anyone who tells you this is one of the best movies of the year must not have been around when The Simpsons first started. This is the Buddy Buddy of Billy Wilder movies – the last gasp – funny maybe, but sad too. There was a time when you and I never missed an episode of The Simpsons. You owe it to yourself to miss this – and keep your fond memories well preserved.


3 Responses to The Simpsons Movie – A Review

  1. RPG says:

    Look at 25 feature length cartoons made in the last three years and tell me where this one ranks among them. I suspect that the isssue is your prefrence for Annie Hall-type intellect and wit blinds you from the fact that, considering the genre, The Simpsons was pretty good. Not great but fun and entertaining.
    If, when you went into that theatre, you were hoping for the a life affirming top-of-the-mountain experience and were dissapointed I’d lay the blame on faulty expectations rather than a poorly excecuted film.
    Compare this film to others in it’s genre and tell he how it fares.

  2. jtatham says:

    RPG – Ok, ok. So “The Simpsons Movie” isn’t as bad as bubonic plague or anything. All I’m saying is that it could have been better. They waited 20 years to make it and then they made a longer version of a typical episode. I suppose that’s all it was ever going to be, but if the producers couldn’t imagine anything bigger or better, why bother? Ok, the film is fine as it is, but why couldn’t it be dazzling? There are episodes from the early seasons of the show that are among the finest TV comedy ever written. These days the show is moribund. Why reflect how far they’ve fallen? I know feature-length comedy writing is a tough business, and feature-length cartoon comedy writing tougher yet, but “The Simpsons” shouldn’t be a C- affair. Maybe I do speak from dashed expectations, but it’s only because “The Simpsons” used to be TV’s equivalent to “Annie Hall”.

  3. e says:

    Finally watched this movie, and I thought it was hilarious. There is a point where art or quality or any other standards of judgment can be damned, because if it makes me laugh and enjoy myself, I’m going to call it good. Mission accomplished.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: